Blog
In today’s competitive business landscape, hiring the right employees is crucial for success. However, the true cost of hiring goes beyond just payroll and benefits. Failing to properly screen applicants for criminal history, signs of violence, or motor vehicle issues can result in significant financial losses and safety risks for your business. Let’s delve into the true cost of background checks and why they are essential for safeguarding your organization.
Retail Theft: According to the National Retail Federation, theft, including shoplifting and employee theft, cost U.S. retailers over $61.7 billion in 2019 alone. A comprehensive background check can help identify candidates with a history of theft-related offenses, reducing the risk of internal and external theft within your organization.
Workplace Violence: Workplace violence is another critical aspect that cannot be ignored. In 2020, the United States witnessed 392 workplace homicides, alongside 37,060 nonfatal injuries caused by intentional harm from another person. These numbers serve as a stark reminder of the potential dangers lurking within the workplace, dangers that could potentially be mitigated through diligent background screenings.
Employee Vehicle Accidents: Motor vehicle accidents involving employees can lead to costly lawsuits, insurance claims, and reputational damage for businesses. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that motor vehicle crashes cost employers $60 billion annually in medical care, legal expenses, property damage, and lost productivity. Background checks that include driving records help identify candidates with a history of reckless driving or DUI convictions, reducing the likelihood of accidents while on the job.
Drug Use: Substance abuse among employees can result in decreased productivity, absenteeism, workplace accidents, and increased healthcare costs for employers. The National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD) reports that drug abuse costs American businesses over $81 billion annually. Pre-employment drug screening as part of a comprehensive background check can help identify candidates with substance abuse issues, allowing employers to make informed hiring decisions and maintain a safe work environment.
By investing in thorough background checks, businesses can mitigate the risks associated with hiring and protect their bottom line. While the upfront cost of background checks may seem significant, it pales in comparison to the potential financial and safety repercussions of hiring unqualified or high-risk individuals. Moreover, background checks demonstrate a commitment to due diligence and the safety of employees and customers, enhancing trust and credibility in the eyes of stakeholders.
To protect your business and ensure a safe working environment, here are some tips for conducting effective background checks:
- Implement a Comprehensive Screening Policy: Define clear guidelines for what your background checks will cover. This can include criminal history, credit checks, verification of education and employment history, and drug testing.
- Use Reputable Screening Services: Partner with a credible background screening provider to ensure the accuracy and legality of the checks you perform.
- Stay Informed about Legal Compliance: Ensure that your screening process complies with federal, state, and local laws to avoid potential legal pitfalls.
- Conduct Periodic Checks: For certain positions, consider conducting periodic background checks to address any issues that may arise after employment.
- Promote a Transparent Process: Communicate with potential hires about the screening process, what it entails, and how the information will be used. This transparency can build trust and deter applicants who may have something to hide.
In conclusion, the true cost of background checks extends beyond monetary expenses to encompass the safety, reputation, and overall well-being of your business. By prioritizing thorough screening procedures, businesses can mitigate the risks of theft, violence, accidents, and substance abuse, ultimately safeguarding their assets and fostering a secure work environment.
Hiring practices are constantly evolving, but in the 30+ years SELECTiON.COM® has been in business, background check usage by companies has been and continues to be on the rise. Background checks are still the most effective way of taking reasonable precautions to create a safe work environment for your employees and minimize costly turnovers. In addition, new reporting methods continue to make background checks more effective and reliable year after year.
Contact us today to see how SELECTiON.COM® can improve your background check process.
This page gives a general overview of legal matters. However, it is your responsibility to ensure compliance with all the relevant federal, state, and local laws governing this area. SELECTiON.COM® does not provide legal advice, and we always suggest consulting your legal counsel for all applicant approval matters.
This page is provided for information purposes only, and the contents hereof are subject to change without notice. This page is not warranted to be error-free nor subject to any other warranties or conditions, whether expressed orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
Sources:
National Retail Federation: https://nrf.com/media-center/press-releases/retailers-stem-peak-theft-season-shopping-season-heats
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): https://www.osha.gov/workplace-violence
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): https://www.nhtsa.gov/
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD): https://www.ncadd.org/about-addiction/addiction-update/drug-abuse-costs-america-over-740-billion-per-year
Want to work together?
Leave us a message and we'll get in touch!
Blog, Resources
In the dynamic landscape of employment law, staying abreast of legal developments is paramount for businesses and individuals alike. One ruling that has sparked significant discussion and implications recently is the California Court of Appeal decision in All of Us Or None Of Us v. Hamrick, which could potentially reshape the realm of employment background checks in the state.
Issued on 05/26/2021, the ruling stems from a civil rights complaint filed in Riverside, California, by a Civil Rights Organization advocating for the rights of former and currently incarcerated individuals. At its core, the case addresses concerns surrounding the accessibility of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) on public access portals, particularly in Los Angeles County.
A key aspect of the ruling mandates the redaction of all PII other than the name from public access portals. While this move aims to safeguard the privacy rights of individuals involved in the criminal justice system, it presents a significant challenge for background check companies and employers conducting pre-employment screenings.
Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) guidelines, obtaining additional identifiers beyond just the name is often crucial for thorough background checks. However, with the new requirement limiting the number of names per full docket order to access such information, the process becomes more cumbersome and time-consuming. As a result, delays in background check completion ranging from a week to several months are anticipated. Most searches that are clear will be completed within 48 to 72 hours. However, if additional research is needed to clarify a record, a full docket must be ordered.
The ramifications of this ruling are far-reaching, impacting employers across various industries. In an era where hiring decisions are increasingly scrutinized, ensuring compliance with evolving legal standards is essential to mitigate risks of legal action and reputational damage. Employers in California must navigate these changes with diligence and adapt their hiring practices accordingly. It’s imperative to strike a balance between conducting thorough background checks to ensure workplace safety and compliance with legal requirements while also respecting the privacy rights of job applicants.
As the legal landscape surrounding employment background checks continues to evolve, businesses must stay informed and adaptable to ensure compliance and integrity in their hiring processes. At SELECTiON.COM®, we understand the complexities and challenges presented by regulatory changes such as the recent California Court of Appeal ruling.
By partnering with SELECTiON.COM®, businesses can benefit from our comprehensive understanding of regulatory requirements and access to cutting-edge technology and resources for efficient and reliable background screening solutions.
In an era where hiring decisions are subject to increasing scrutiny and legal complexity, trust SELECTiON.COM® to be your partner in navigating the ever-changing landscape of employment background checks with confidence and peace of mind.
Contact us today to see how SELECTiON.COM® can improve your background check process.
This page gives a general overview of legal matters. However, it is your responsibility to ensure compliance with all the relevant federal, state, and local laws governing this area. SELECTiON.COM® does not provide legal advice, and we always suggest consulting your legal counsel for all applicant approval matters.
This page is provided for information purposes only, and the contents hereof are subject to change without notice. This page is not warranted to be error-free nor subject to any other warranties or conditions, whether expressed orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
Blog
In a move toward promoting fair employment practices and second chances for individuals with criminal records, the California Civil Rights Council (CCRC) has recently made amendments to the regulations in California’s 2018 Fair Chance Act. These revised regulations, which went into effect on October 1, 2023, aim to provide greater clarity and guidance to employers and job seekers alike. The Fair Chance Act, also known as “Ban the Box,” has been a pivotal piece of legislation in California’s ongoing efforts to reduce discrimination against those with criminal histories in the hiring process.
Background
The 2018 Fair Chance Act, signed into law by then-Governor Jerry Brown, is a piece of legislation designed to provide individuals with prior criminal convictions a fair shot at employment. The Act restricts employers from inquiring about an applicant’s criminal history until after a conditional offer of employment has been extended. This means that employers are prohibited from including questions about criminal records on job applications or during initial interviews. The Act aims to ensure that individuals with criminal records are not immediately disqualified from job opportunities, giving them a chance to prove their qualifications and suitability for the position.
The Amendments
The recent amendments made by the California Civil Rights Council seek to further strengthen the Fair Chance Act and provide additional clarity to both employers and job seekers. Some of the key changes include:
- Timing of Background Checks: The revised regulations specify the appropriate timing for conducting background checks. Employers are now required to wait until after a conditional offer has been made before conducting any background checks. This helps ensure that an applicant’s criminal history is not used as an initial screening tool.
- Individualized Assessment: The amendments emphasize the importance of conducting an individualized assessment when considering an applicant’s criminal history. Employers are encouraged to consider factors such as the nature and gravity of the offense, the time that has passed since the conviction, and the applicant’s rehabilitation efforts.
- Notice Requirements: Employers must now provide clear and specific notices to applicants if they intend to take adverse action based on their criminal history. These notices should include information about the conviction(s) that are the basis for the decision and a reasonable opportunity for the applicant to respond.
- Training Requirements: The revised regulations also highlight the importance of training for employers to ensure compliance with the Fair Chance Act. Employers are encouraged to provide training to their staff involved in the hiring process to ensure that they understand and adhere to the law.
Impact and Implications
By providing clearer guidelines for employers and emphasizing individualized assessments, these changes are expected to reduce discrimination and open up more employment opportunities for those who deserve a second chance. It’s important to note that employers should familiarize themselves with these updated regulations and ensure that their hiring practices align with the Fair Chance Act. Failure to do so may result in legal consequences.
Further information on these changes can be found on the Ogletree website and other sources across the web.
Contact us today to see how SELECTiON.COM® can improve your background check process.
This page gives a general overview of legal matters. However, it is your responsibility to ensure compliance with all the relevant federal, state, and local laws governing this area. SELECTiON.COM® does not provide legal advice, and we always suggest consulting your legal counsel for all applicant approval matters.
This page is provided for information purposes only, and the contents hereof are subject to change without notice. This page is not warranted to be error-free nor subject to any other warranties or conditions, whether expressed orally or implied in law, including implied warranties and conditions of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
Blog, Resources
The world is (hopefully) getting back to normal soon now that vaccines are readily available to the general public. That means we can move back into our offices and begin the daily grind alongside each other once again. Right? That may be true for some, but many companies will likely decide to keep part of their workforce remote or offer flex positions.
The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally transformed the office workspace. A recent study by LiveCareer found that 61% of employees want their employer to let them work in a remote capacity indefinitely. Also, 29% of working professionals go so far as to say that they would quit if they had to return to the office after the pandemic. That leaves companies set on returning to the typical 9-5 in-office workspace in quite a predicament.
If you were one of the many companies delaying implementing remote positions pre-COVID-19, you weren’t alone. Among many reasons, companies feared productivity issues would be a logistical nightmare. And, while there have certainly been some bumps along the way, many companies have effectively implemented remote positions. A recent survey by Mercer, a human resources and workplace benefits firm, showed 94 percent of 800 employers surveyed indicated productivity was the same or higher with their employees working remotely.
Many companies are considering drastically downsizing their office space for the coming year and offering flex positions.
According to a survey from the consulting firm, PwC found that executives and employees are converging around a post-pandemic future with a lot more flexibility, yet few are prepared to completely abandon the office space. As a result, by design or default, most companies are heading toward a hybrid workplace where a large number of office employees rotate in and out of offices configured for shared spaces.
That seems to confirm LiveCareer’s further findings. Thirty percent of professionals surveyed said that if going back to the office is inevitable, they’d like to work there three days a week. Twenty-five percent said two days a week, and 19% said one day. Just 9% said four days.
So, what does this mean for you? And how does this affect hiring and background checks?
Remote hiring was likely a fast-tracked implementation for many, so now is the perfect time to reflect on what did and did not work over the last year. What steps of the hiring process can now be improved and secured?
Here are our hiring tips for the post-COVID-19 reality:
- Clearly define your background check requirements per position. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) already recommends this to avoid disparate impact. Adding fully remote or flex job offerings may change the background check selection, so be sure to appropriately update your handbooks or hiring guidelines.
- Be sure to make it clear if you plan on making a currently remote position in-house once the pandemic is over.
- Are you going to offer flex positions? If so, be clear on when they are expected to be in the office. For example, will it be one or two specific days a week or days of their choosing, etc…
- If you require a video interview, be sure to use an application compatible with the most common devices, such as Apple, Android, and Windows.
- There has been a significant shift in how people shop, resulting in an uptick in hacker activity and an increased need for cybersecurity. Therefore, it’s more important than ever to partner with a background check company that offers an easy-to-use and secure online portal for applicants to enter personal information.
In addition to everything above, it’s important to note that while EEOC recommendations will likely evolve with the new remote/flex working reality, the requirement of strict Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) regulation adherence remains the same.
- Always obtain a signed release form.
- If a person is denied the position, regardless of the reason, always send a copy of their background check, a Pre-Decision letter, and a copy of their consumer rights.
- Follow up with an adverse action letter five business days later.
In these uncertain times, it pays to have a trusted partner who can provide the data you need and the customer support to answer all your questions. Our unparalleled support, combined with our nationwide researcher network, makes SELECTiON.COM® a valuable background check partner.
Our five-star customer support team is not only industry experienced but tenured in their time with our company. Our staff is available to you via phone, email, and chat, Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 8 pm.
SELECTiON.COM® offers employment and education verifications, character reference reports, criminal history reports, and our Search America® locator tool is the largest in the industry with other 1 billion records.
Contact us today to develop a fast and accurate background check program to meet your needs.
NOTE: This article gives a general overview of legal matters. However, it is your responsibility to ensure compliance with all the relevant federal, state, and local laws governing this area. SELECTiON.COM® does not provide legal advice, and we always suggest consulting your legal counsel for all applicant approval matters.
Blog, Resources
According to the U.S Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), over 90 million individuals, approximately 30% of the population in the country, have a criminal record on file in state criminal history repositories.
This statistic does not include traffic infractions (e.g., improper turns, parking violations, failure to stop, some speeding violations, among others) which are the most common form of infractions and also do not appear in criminal records (when they are paid, or the court citation was fulfilled), because traffic tickets are classified as infractions and are considered non-criminal offenses.
Misdemeanors (e.g., Driving Under Influence (DUI), disorderly conduct, use of controlled substances, simple assault, among others) are more serious offenses than infractions and appear in criminal records. In some circumstances, a misdemeanor can escalate to a felony. Felonies are the most serious types of crimes (e.g., DUI that causes injury, serious bodily injury or death, murder, robbery, aggravated assault, rape, among others). Like misdemeanors, felonies also appear in the criminal history on file in state criminal history repositories.
Criminal records vary from one-time arrest, where charges may be dropped completely, to violent, serious, and lengthy criminal histories. The BJS statistics show that the majority of arrests are for non-violent and minor offenses, only 4% of the arrests are for felonies, and most arrests, both misdemeanors and felonies, do not end in a conviction.
According to the Society for Human Resource Management, nine out of ten employers run criminal background screens on applicants as part of their hiring process. Employers require consumer reports in order to ensure a safe work environment for employees and to assess the overall trustworthiness of the job candidate. Background screenings also reduce theft, embezzlement and other criminal activity. Some background screenings are required by state law for a position such as a teacher or licensed medical practitioner. Employers are not only protecting the company’s reputation but are also reducing the risk of legal liability for negligent hiring. Thus, in the selection process, some companies reject applicants who have criminal charges.
Employers should be aware that it is highly likely that consumer reports may have negative information about the applicants. In these instances, a greater understanding is important to dispel some employers’ myths or paradigms. “The fact of an arrest does not establish that criminal conduct has occurred. Arrests are not proof of criminal conduct. Many arrests do not result in criminal charges or the charges are dismissed,” according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). By contrast, records of convictions of crimes will usually serve as sufficient evidence that a person engaged in improper conduct.
Finding a point of balance and justice between millions of people with criminal records at the time of getting a job and the legitimacy of the employers to not consider an applicant for employment based on their criminal records, has become a great challenge. The law, jurisprudence, and institutions like the EEOC have all weighed in on this situation.
First, the Fair Credit Reporting Act restricts Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRA’s) reporting any non-convictions older than 7 years, unless the applicant is expected to earn 75,000 or more annually [15 U.S.C. 1681c (a) (2) (5)]. Some state laws and local ordinances also restrict CRA’s from reporting non-convictions regardless of age.
Thereby, the large number of applicants who have criminal records are not marked for life because non-convictions (records of arrest and certain adverse information) are not reflected in the consumer reports with the passage of some years and may not be reported at all. These restrictions create a point of balance between employers and applicants with criminal records. For employers, they can still know relevant information about the applicant, like convictions, and for the applicants because not all the information about their criminal history may be disclosed. SELECTiON.COM® works diligently on compliance with federal and state law regarding these restrictions.
Second, the jurisprudence has cited three factors that employers shall seriously consider in their hiring policies when the applicant has a criminal record (Green v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, 549 F.2d 1158, 8th Cir. 1977). The three factors are; the nature and gravity of the offense or conduct; the time that has passed since the offense, conduct and/or completion of the sentence, and the nature of the job held or sought.
Finally, the EEOC has consolidated and updated enforcement guidance regarding the use of arrest or conviction records in employment decisions. The guide describes two types of discrimination in employment decisions, disparate treatment and disparate impact. According to the EEOC, disparate treatment means “a violation may occur when an employer treats criminal history information differently for different applicants or employees, based on their race or national origin.” For its part, disparate-impact liability may occur when “an employer’s neutral policy (e.g., excluding applicants from employment based on certain criminal conduct) may disproportionately impact some individuals protected under Title VII and may violate the law if not job-related and consistent with business necessity,” the guide explains.
It is very important for decision-makers, hiring officials, and managers to know the law, jurisprudence, and the EEOC enforcement guidance to allow employers to make hiring decisions appropriate and equitable, without engaging in discrimination.
In conclusion, employers are challenged to provide this large number of individuals the opportunity to apply, be considered, and hired for a job. In the end, it is in the employer’s hands to analyze the seriousness of the applicants’ conduct and create a balance between an opportunity and responsible hiring.
This article gives a general overview of the legal matters. However, it is your responsibility to ensure compliance with all the relevant federal, state, and local laws governing this area. SELECTiON.COM® does not provide legal advice, and we always suggest consulting your own legal counsel for all applicant approval matters.
